Historically, the Sassanid did deal with a number of
Arab tribes that supported Parthia. For this series I selected the Camel
mounted troops and not the blade option. There are two elements of blade
supported by two of bow and these should be sufficient to hold off cavalry, but
camel mounted will destroy knights on a recoil outcome which should keep the
Sassanid on their toes.
II/69a Sassanid vs. II/23a Nomadic Arab
Terrain:
Dry terrain which
included two difficult hills, two rough ground and a dune.
Game 1
The Sassanid deployment avoided the rough ground and
dunes by forming up to the right of these. The difficult hill ahead would
certainly be filled with archers so a plan was devised to ‘pull’ the Nomad
centre away from their supporting archers.
The Nomads had anticipated this and anchored their left
flank and wheeled their line to face the Sassanid attack. The Nomads were able
to counter the Sassanid effort moving around the hill but were less successful
on the right.
The area between the hill and rough ground became a
slaughter house with both commanders joining the battle. Despite the advantage
of numbers the Sassanid were able to turn the battle in their favour. Score 2 – 4 for Sassan.
Game 2
For the second battle the Sassanid changed their deployment
and formed two groups in place of the usual three as this would bring the light
horse in close support of the heavy cavalry. The Nomad adjusted their own
deployment by placing all their camel mounted troops on the left while the
infantry would make good use of the rocky ground and hill.
Nomad skirmishers quickly seized a flanking position
on the slopes threatening the Sassanid light horse. Nomad light horse moved in
support to attack on the following turn. Elsewhere, signals were mixed (low pip
score) and the Sassanid advance did not move as planned.
When the Sassanid attack on the right was finally
delivered the Nomad infantry had steadily advanced to cut gaps in the left wing
with their effective archery. With no means to turn the tide, Ardashir called a
general retreat. Score 2 – 4 for Nomad
Arabs.
Game 3
In the final battle the Sassanid were fortunate to
deny the Nomad use of the favourable terrain. The Nomads did anchor their left
on the rough ground, but their right was fully exposed on the open plain. To
remedy this, a reserve of light horse and camel scouts formed a second line.
This time the Sassanid effort between wings and centre
was better coordinated. On the left, the majority of light horse was able to
flank the Nomad position drawing the reserve units away from the main battle.
The Asavaran were able to contend with the camel mounted Nomad while the nobles
led by Ardashir broke up the Nomad centre. Score 3 – 5 for Sassan.
No comments:
Post a Comment