Tuesday, 25 May 2021

The Wedge formation in DBA3

DBA3 lists several armies with cavalry in double based wedge formation; the Nikephorian Byzantine, Medieval German and the Teutonic Order. The brief text. accompanying each list, describe differently armed or knights in full plate armour in front and lesser armoured types placed to their rear forming a deep wedge or ‘spitz’. These differ visually from cavalry placed in two rows of 3, such as the ally Lorrainer cavalry of the Swiss and the kavaillaroi of the Thematic Byzantine. Both double based elements add +1 if in frontal close combat with enemy foot and the DBE is entirely in good going.

Since the start of this project (late 15th century) I have encountered few examples of German armies employing the deeper wedge formation; Tannenberg (1410) and during the First Margrave’s War (1449) come to mind. What is noteworthy, most conflicts within the Holy Roman Empire. in the last half of the 15th century, do not record large numbers of mounted troops with fully armoured types (3Kn) accounting for a small portion of the total. Reasons for this have been covered in an earlier post, see Cities and Towns, but foremost is the increased tactical use of infantry (pikemen, handgunners) and field artillery.

Where does this leave the double based wedge (6Kn) of the Medieval German Army lists? The number of mounted troops, as mentioned earlier, was relatively small with the “lance or gleven” deploying in separate formations; one of armoured men-at-arms, coustilliers and mounted crossbowmen (later handgunners); a tactic used by Fredrich I, count of Palatine, at the Battle of Seckenheim (1465). Between the years 1480 and 1493, Philipp von Seldeneck, who fought on the side of Fredrick I, wrote a tactical treatise, ‘Ordnung für grosse Heere und Schlacten’. I was fortunate to stumble across an analysis of the work presented in a monograph by Erik Neubauer, and published at the University of Heidelberg in 1963.

The treatise is divided in sections, four describe the wagenburg, infantry formations, infantry tactics, and the last two, the cavalry. The section, Cavalry Organisation, von Seldeneck details the formation of a wedge consisting of 1000 cavalry, outlining the number of rank and files required. One gains the impression that this is an ideal formation as it is followed by examples of smaller formations consisting of 200 or 100 cavalry. Considering the number of cavalry employed the last half of the 15th century, such as Pillenreuth, 1450, Seckenheim, 1465 and between Poland and the Teutonic Order during the Thirteen Years War (1454 – 1467), it would not seem unreasonable if wedges were used, these would be formed with smaller numbers.

Returning to DBA3, there are two examples of cavalry in a single based wedge; the Macedonian Companions and Scythian nobles. These look pretty, however do not gain the +1 in frontal close combat with foot troops plus have the inconvenience of recoiling their base depth (1BW) which can become hazardous. This becomes less a problem if players follow the tactics written by von Seldeneck,  

Since the publication of DBA3, there have been a number of interesting suggestions exchanged at the DBA Fanaticus Forum concerning the effectiveness of light horse. One suggestion which has gained traction, LH ignore enemy in corner-to-corner contact with its front edge. This is similar to the exception allowed to psiloi and Scythed Chariots when in frontal close combat with an enemy. Wedge formations would also benefit from a similar rule, ignoring enemy corner-to-corner contact, as this would compensate for the lack of a +1 for the support enjoyed by the double based element by allowing it to focus on an enemy to its front.  

Tuesday, 4 May 2021

Mounted Infantry in DBA3

Mounted infantry was not a troop type that I was familiar with, despite my long experience with DBA. It was not until the refurbishment and subsequent regrouping the late medieval collection into armies that I discovered just how many armies listed them. Their only mention, in the rule book, comes at page 5 detailing the composition and base size; 3-4 foot plus a vehicle, led mount or mounted figure are placed on a 40mm x 40mm base for 15mm size figures.

Gleaning through the army lists, here is an overview of mounted infantry types. Note, these are all bow armed, fast or solid, infantry.

Book I             Neo-Elamite,  kallapani carrying 3 archers (Mtd-3Bw).

Book III          Central Asian Turkish, archers on Bactrian camels (Mtd-3Bw)

Book IV           Anglo-Norman, mounted archers (Mtd-3Bw)

Book IV           Scots Common, mounted archers (Mtd-3Bw)

Book IV           Khwarizmian, archers on camels (Mtd-3Bw)

Book IV           Later Hungarian, Crusader crossbowmen (Mtd-4Cb)

Book IV           100 Year’s’ War English, mounted archers (Mtd-4Lb)

Book IV           Free Company, English archers (Mtd-4Lb)

Book IV           French Ordonnance, mounted archers (Mtd-4Lb)

Book IV           Burgundian Ordonnance, mounted archers (Mtd-4Lb).    


The following advantages-disadvantages come to mind and apologies if any have been missed.


Can be destroyed by any mounted in close combat with a better than score.

Base depth may pose a problem when recoiling.

In close combat with solid foot, bows will recoil on an even score.



Can make a second and subsequent move in good going.

Solid bows add +1 if supported by solid blade.

Knights are destroyed in close combat on an even score with Lb or Cb 

Fast troop types recoil from solid on an even score.   


If the above list of armies seems lean, the opposite is true if reading the DBMM army lists. I do not play DBMM, but do find the army list books a useful research tool. The revised edition was published two years after DBA3 and does benefit from the latest research or translations.

DBMM Book IV has been illuminating as the mounted infantry types are greatly expanded and the number of armies using them has increased; as an example, you will find more Mtd-4Cb, but also Mtd-4Bd, Mtd-Sp and Mtd-Ps. Plans are made to add these to the collection as there are a number of scenarios that would require them. And so, the hobby marches forward.

 Mounted longbow holding the English right at Castillon.