This new series will match the Sassanid sub-lists versus
each of their enemies. Some matches will have been done earlier, but there are
always new cunning plans and ideas for terrain placement that need
experimenting.
Sassanid sub-list ‘a’ represents the revolt led by Ardashir
I and his initial conquests deposing first the Parthian overlord in the west,
then marching north to subdue a number of realms, clash briefly with Rome
before ending his first major campaign in Armenia.
The Adiabene were a number of city states supported
Parthia during the final years. Their strength lay with a goodly number of
archers supported by blade and javelinmen while the mounted troops are a mix of
cataphract, horse archers and caravan guard.
II/69a Sassanid vs. II/22e Adiabene
Terrain:
II/69a Sassanid vs. II/22e Adiabene
Terrain:
Hilly which included two difficult
hills and two rough ground.
Game 1
Difficult hills cover one side of the battlefield
leaving perfect cavalry ground for this battle. The Sassanid formed up in their
standard formation of heavies in the centre with horse archers extending both
flanks. Having fewer cavalry, the Adiabene make use of the rough ground and
difficult hills to deploy their foot troops in and what light horse are available,
these deploy to the open flank.
The Sassanid seized the initiative to switch their effort
and envelop the open flank while the remainder of the cavalry move slowly forward.
Adiabene infantry now hold both hills with archers and skirmishers and are
making their presence felt.
The Adiabene archers cause no casualties but do send
cavalry formations back. To compensate for the increase range, the Adiabene
line moves slowly forward while firing their bows. The Sassanid effort on the
left flank proved effective and soon they will sweep down on the Adiabene right
flank.
Losing the right flank and more troops from the centre,
the Adiabene commander signalled for a general retreat. Score 2 – 5 for Sassan.
Game 2
The Sassanid was fortunate to catch the Adiabene
forces in the open as the terrain to their rear would have been a nightmare for
a cavalry force to fight in.
At the outset of the battle, the Sassanid placed their
main effort on both flanks and refuse the centre. This left the Adiabene no
option but to close the distance if they were to benefit from their archery
advantage.
The tactic worked well as the Sassanid right flank
were now free to roll up the open left flank of the Adiabene infantry and help
score a second victory. Score 2 – 5 for
Sassan.
Game 3
For the third battle, the relative positions were
nearly the same, that is the Adiabene army were again caught in the open , however,
the Sassanid were slightly inconvenienced by the rough ground and hills.
The Sassanid modified
their battle plan to concentrate their effort on their right flank and entice
the Adiabene army forward in the same manner as the previous engagement.
This time the Adiabene archers improved their skills
and were rapidly cutting down troops and joining in close combat against the
Sassanid. The emboldened Adiabene were quickly the masters of the field. Score 4 – 1 for Adiabene.
No comments:
Post a Comment