Raiding parties had become
a perennial occurrence for the Byzantine Empire and by the mid-10th
century, the Bedouin felt emboldened to strike deeper into the Anatolian plain.
As general, Nicephorus Phokas revitalised the East Roman army well enough to not
only counter the raids but undertake punitive expeditions into the heart of the
emirates of Aleppo and Mosul.
Game one
Pursuing one such raiding
party, Nicephorus sent a flying column to block its passage through the Taurus
mountains. Traversing the Taurus mountains, Bedouin scouts reported Romans were
blocking their path.
Despite the narrowness of
the terrain, the Bedouin commander deployed infantry on both flanks with a
screen of light cavalry in centre. Behind this line, heavy and light cavalry were
positioned as a reserve.
The opening moves by the
Bedouin fell foul to some miscommunication leaving the right wing to move forward
unsupported. The infantry of the right wing quickly took casualties as the East
Romans counter attacked with such rapidity not seen before.
The Dailami were first to
fall leaving the hills on the right in East Roman hands. Roman cavalry charged the
Bedouin spear and overwhelmed a number of units.
In an effort to counter
balance the situation on the right, the Bedouin commander ordered units on the
left and centre to engage the Romans. The effort gathered little momentum.
Seeing the right wing broken, the Bedouin fled leaving their plunder behind.
Score 8 – 1 for the Nikephorian Byzantine.
Nikephorian Byzantine
2 x general (Cv), 8 x kavaillaroi
(Cv), 2 x light horse (LH), 2 x Klibanophoroi (6Kn), 6 x skoutatoi (8Bw), 2 x
Rus auxilia (3Ax), 2 x archer (Ps).
The Emir of Aleppo
2 x general (Cv), 2 x
lancer (Cv), 8 x Arabitai (LH), 2 x Dailami (4Ax), 8 x thughur (Sp), 2 x archer
(Ps).
Game two
With the East Roman army
fully occupied with the Emir of Aleppo, the Emir of Mosul sent his own raiding
party into former Armenian land. Gathering his forces, the Strategos moved to intercept
the Bedouin before they could cross the frontier. To his surprise, the Bedouin
were arrayed for battle with infantry in their centre, the Bedouin light horse
on the left and Kurdish allies on the right.
The East Romans led with
their right wing with the cavalry (Klibanophoroi) of the centre moving in
echelon behind. The Arabitai did not stand their ground but moved away exposing
a second line further back.
Hesitation struck as the
East Romans found themselves outnumbered and their flank threatened.
The hesitation was an invitation
that the Bedouin gladly accepted. The ensuing clash of proved devastating for
the East Romans leaving survivors to recover their wits as they fell back on
their reserve formation. This had a knock-on effect as Cavalry formations in
centre now ground to a halt leaving the Strategos to shift his effort
elsewhere.
It was at this moment; the
Kurds decided to demonstrate their prowess and charge the East Roman cavalry
with the shock sending them back on their second line. The situation became
desperate as East Roman were quickly suffering casualties on both wings. To
relieve the pressure, the Strategos ordered the infantry forward.
In less than an hour of
combat, both wings of the East Roman army were neutralised and the final indignity
was the loss of a unit of Klibanophoroi to Kurdish bowmen leaving a flummoxed Strategos
to call a retreat. Score 8 –1 Dynastic Bedouin.
Nikephorian Byzantine
2 x general (Cv), 8 x kavaillaroi
(Cv), 2 x light horse (LH), 2 x Klibanophoroi (6Kn), 6 x skoutatoi (8Bw), 2 x
Rus auxilia (3Ax), 2 x archer (Ps).
The Emir of Mosul
2 x general (Cv), 2 x
lancer (Cv), 8 x Arabitai (LH), 4 x thughur (Sp), 2 x archer (Ps) plus Kurdish
allies: 4 x cavalry (3Kn), 2 x archers (3Bw).
Great looking games with beautiful and unusual armies...impressive banners!
ReplyDeleteThank you Phil,
ReplyDeleteI am pleased with the refurbishment of the entire Arab collection.
Two more Arab armies are planned, but these will be conversions from existing figures.
The banners do improve the look of any medieval army.
Cheers,
Looking very sweet indeed
ReplyDelete