This series
bringing pike armies to the game table features the Graeco-Bactrian army and
the Classical Indian army of the Mauryan dynasty. W.W. Tarn in his book, The
Greeks in Bactria and India (1966) describes in chapter four the campaigns
conducted by Demerius, his son Demerius II and Menander. The book is available
online and worth a read.
In our
test games, the Indian army have an imposing array of bow, chariots, elephants
and cavalry and defend their tropical homeland against the Greek invaders. The
game board is 80cm x 80cm and terrain pieces selected for all three games were
two woods and two marsh areas.
Game one
The
constricted nature of the battle field forced both sides to deploy in deeper
formations. For the Mauryan, all infantry were positioned to the right with
their entire elephant corps and chariots taking the left hand position; all the
cavalry formed up behind them.
Facing
them, the Greeks amassed their pike opposite the infantry leaving the Greek
cavalry to deal with the elephants and chariot in front of them. An assault would
be in echelon with the pike formations leading and cavalry in support.
The Greek pike
columns did performed their task well but the Mauryan were quick to exploit the moment to mount their attack against the supporting units.
Casualties
fell heavily on both sides eventually reaching an even score of 4 – 4.
The fatal blow came when the Mauryan cavalry helped seal the fate of the Greek lancers to end the score at 5 – 4.
Game two
Battlefield
two offered the Greeks ample room to extend their formations with the infantry
securing their left along the marsh and wood leaving the open terrain for the
cavalry to operate in. Mauryan infantry formed up against the Greek foot
leaving enough space for just the elephant corps to deploy leaving all the cavalry
and chariots took a reserve position behind the main battle line.
In range, Indian
archery proved effective at sending a few Greek formations back on their heels while the elephant corps struck the Greek cavalry.
Both lines became heavily engaged and the battle line now broke up into isolated combats. Disaster struck the Greek side as
their general became wounded and was carried off the field (2g – 2).
Despite the lose of the general, the Greeks surpassed themselves by redoubling the efforts (good pip scores).
Casualties fell on both sides to bring the score to an even 4g – 4. The final
blow came when the elephants trampled a unit of Greek lancers to end the battle. Score
5(g) – 4 India
Game three
The
presence of woods and marsh did not hinder the armies as both sides could deploy
their formations in an extended line. The Greeks used their standard formation while
the Indian army placed their infantry in center with units of mounted covering both
flanks.
Greek
infantry spearheaded the attack leaving the cavalry to cover both flanks. The Mauryan responded by advancing only their infantry and elephant corps forward with the chariot and cavalry held back in reserve.
Both lines
crashed into each other causing immediate casualties. The Greeks lost their elephant to the tribal skirmishers but pike columns took their revenge by opening the Indian battle line.
The
slaughter continued with the chariot corps crushing the mercenary units to bring
a decisive victory over the Bactrian host. Score
4 – 2 India.
In Retrospect
The Indian
army had a greater number of mounted units than the Bactrian side. This advantage was negated some by the constricted terrain in the first two games, Both games
ended with narrow victories for the Mauryan that easily could have gone to the other way.
In the final
game both sides could extend their lines fully which offered the deploy in extended lines offering the Indian host a
slight advantage. Destroying the Bactrian elephant at the outset was critical for the Greeks as they could not regain their momentum.
Army
composition
II/36a
Graeco-Bactrian 250 BC – 130 BC
1 x General (3Kn), 1 x Arachosians (LH), 1 x Saka horse
archers (LH), 2 x Iranian lancers (3Kn), 1 x Indian elephant (El), 4 x
phalangites (4Pk), 1 x militia settlers (4Ax), 1 x Cretan archers (Ps).
II/3a Classical Indian 500 BC – 175 AD
1 x General (El), 2 x elephants
(El), 2 x 4 horse chariots (HCh), 2 x cavalry (Cv), 3 x archers (4LB), 1 x
javelinmen (4Ax), 1 x wild tribal archers (Ps).
Again the pike army gets the wrong end of the stick, how did they ever win an empire? Would it be just as unbalanced the other way if each pike element were treated as two as commented on the last game?
ReplyDeleteRob,
ReplyDeleteHistorically, the invasion of the Mauryan kingdom did not win any territorial gains and that can be read in Tarn’s book. From a game perspective the armies are evenly matched despite the final result. In a week or so we should play the all cavalry option for the Bactrian and that should deliver a few victories.